Wednesday, 17 January 2024

CSS EXAMINATION :GENDER STUDIES-2019

 

Roll Number

 
FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

COMPETITIVE EXAMINATION-2019

                       GENDER STUDIES

 

TIME ALLOWED: THREE HOURS

PART-I(MCQS):         MAXIMUM 30 MINUTES

PART-I (MCQS)      MAXIMUM MARKS = 20 PART-II         MAXIMUM MARKS = 80

NOTE: (i) Part-II is to be attempted on the separate Answer Book.

(ii)         Attempt ONLY FOUR questions from PART-II. ALL questions carry EQUAL marks.

(iii)      All the parts (if any) of each Question must be attempted at one place instead of at different places.

(iv)       Write Q. No. in the Answer Book in accordance with Q. No. in the Q.Paper.

(v)         No Page/Space be left blank between the answers. All the blank pages of Answer Book must be crossed.

(vi)         Extra attempt of any question or any part of the question will not be considered.

 FOR BETTER UNDERSTANDING/ASSIMILATION I ATTEMPTED /PREPARED SOME OF THE PREVIOUS PAPERS. SHARE THESE SUBSEQUENTLY FOR THE ASPIRANTS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INCOMING EXAMINATIONS.

 

PART-II



 

Q. No. 2.

How do you differentiate the discipline of Gender Studies from that of Women Studies? Historically trace the need for the establishment of Gender Studies as a distinct discipline and its scope and significance with special reference to Pakistan.

A . Difference and Development of Gender Studies and Women Studies

1 . Women Studies

  • Emerged in the 1970s as a feminist academic movement
  • Challenged male-dominated and androcentric knowledge production
  • Highlighted women’s experiences, contributions, and issues
  • Focused on women as a marginalized and oppressed group
  • Sought to empower women through education, activism, and advocacy

2 . Gender Studies

  • Developed in the late 1980s and early 1990s as a response to critiques and limitations of Women's Studies
  • Critiques included: assuming a universal and homogeneous category of women, ignoring diversity and intersectionality of women’s identities and experiences, neglecting men and masculinity
  • Expanded scope to include not only women, but also men, transgender, and non-binary people
  • Examined how gender interacts with other factors such as race, class, ethnicity, religion, age, ability, and sexuality
  • Adopted a more critical and deconstructive approach to gender, questioning naturalness, stability, and binary of gender categories, and exploring multiple and fluid ways that gender is performed, negotiated, and resisted

3 /Gender Studies in Pakistan

  • Influenced by both global and local factors
  • Global factors: international discourses and debates on gender and development, human rights, and feminism; support and funding from donor agencies and NGOs
  • Local factors: political, economic, social, and cultural situation of Pakistan; challenges and opportunities such as religious fundamentalism, globalization and modernization, diversity and complexity of population, resilience, and activism of women’s movement
  • Established in 1989 as a project by the Ministry of Women Development, Government of Pakistan, in five public universities
  • Initially called Women Studies, later changed to Gender Studies to reflect a broader and more inclusive perspective
  • Grown and expanded since then, with more universities, scholars, students, research, publications, collaborations, and networks

Summary

  • Gender Studies and Women Studies are both interdisciplinary fields that examine gender and sexuality but have different origins, perspectives, and focuses
  • Women's Studies emerged as a feminist movement that challenged male dominance and highlighted women’s issues
  • Gender Studies developed as a response to critiques of Women's Studies that ignored diversity and intersectionality of gender and sexuality
  • Gender Studies in Pakistan was influenced by both global and local factors and has grown and expanded over time
  • Gender Studies provide a critical lens to analyze and understand Pakistani society, and contribute to social change and transformation

 

(20)

Q. No. 3.

Outline and explain the three major waves of feminist movements in the West. Discuss the influence of these waves on feminist movements in Pakistan.

A . The Three Major Waves of Feminism in the West

1 . First Wave: 19th and early 20th century

  • The first wave of feminism began in the late 19th century and continued until the early 20th century.
  • The main goal of the first wave was to secure equal political rights for women, especially the right to vote.
  • The first wave was influenced by the Enlightenment, the French Revolution, the abolitionist movement, and the industrialization of society.
  • Some of the prominent figures of the first wave were Mary Wollstonecraft, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, Emmeline Pankhurst, and Alice Paul.

2 . Second Wave: 1960s to late 1980s

  • The second wave of feminism started in the 1960s and lasted until the late 1980s.
  • The main goal of the second wave was to challenge the patriarchal structures and norms that oppressed women in various aspects of life, such as education, work, family, sexuality, and culture.
  • The second wave was influenced by the civil rights movement, the anti-war movement, the student movement, and the sexual revolution.
  • Some of the prominent figures of the second wave were Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, Simone de Beauvoir, Angela Davis, and Bell Hooks.

3 . Third Wave: 1990s to 2010s

  • The third wave of feminism began in the 1990s and continued until the 2010s.
  • The main goal of the third wave was to celebrate the diversity and intersectionality of women’s identities and experiences and to address the issues of marginalized and oppressed groups of women, such as women of color, LGBTQ+ women, disabled women, and immigrant women.
  • The third wave was influenced by the postmodernism, the globalization, the internet, and the pop culture.
  • Some of the prominent figures of the third wave were Rebecca Walker, Kimberlé Crenshaw, Judith Butler, Naomi Wolf, and Malala Yousafzai.

4 . The Influence of the Three Waves of Feminism on Pakistan

  • The feminist movement in Pakistan has been shaped by both global and local factors and has been influenced by the three waves of feminism in the West to varying degrees.
  • The first wave of feminism had a limited impact on Pakistan, as the country gained its independence in 1947, and women were granted the right to vote and reserved seats in the parliament. However, women still faced many legal and social barriers to their equality and empowerment.
  • The second wave of feminism had a significant impact on Pakistan, as women started to challenge the sexist and oppressive laws and practices that were imposed by the military dictatorship and religious fundamentalism. Women also demanded more education, employment, and political participation. Some of the achievements of the second wave in Pakistan were the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (1961), the Women’s Action Forum (1981), and the Hudood Ordinances Repeal Bill (2006).
  • The third wave of feminism has also influenced Pakistan, as women have become more aware and vocal about their diverse and intersectional issues and identities, and have used the internet and the media to raise their voices and mobilize their movements. Women have also engaged in dialogue and collaboration with other social movements and groups, such as human rights, peace, and environmental movements. Some of the examples of the third wave in Pakistan are the Aurat March (2018), the Digital Rights Foundation (2012), and the Girls at Dhabas (2015).

Summary

  • The question of the three waves of feminism in the West and their influence on Pakistan is complex and multifaceted, requiring a lot of research and analysis.
  • The three waves of feminism in the West are the first wave (19th and early 20th century) which fought for equal political rights for women, the second wave (1960s to late 1980s) which challenged the patriarchal structures and norms that oppressed women in various aspects of life, and the third wave (1990s to 2010s) that celebrated the diversity and intersectionality of women’s identities and experiences.
  • The feminist movement in Pakistan has been influenced by both global and local factors and has been shaped by the three waves of feminism in the West to varying degrees. The first wave had a limited impact, as women already had some political rights. The second wave had a significant impact, as women started to challenge the sexist and oppressive laws and practices. The third wave has also influenced Pakistan, as women have become more aware and vocal about their diverse and intersectional issues and identities.

 

(20)

Q. No. 4.

Explain the relevance of Modernization Theory and Dependency Theory to gender equality. Critically analyze the subordination of women in modern societies in the light of these two theories.

Modernization Theory and Dependency Theory are two of the most common lenses sociologists use when looking at the issues of global inequality and development. They also have different implications for gender equality and the subordination of women in modern societies.

Modernization Theory is a perspective that argues that economic and technological development leads to social and political progress and that societies follow a linear and universal path of modernization from traditional to modern stages12. Modernization Theory assumes that modernization is conducive to gender equality, as it brings more education, employment, and political rights for women, and reduces the influence of patriarchal and religious norms and values that subordinate women13.

Dependency Theory is a perspective that argues that economic and technological development is uneven and unequal and that the global system is divided into core and periphery countries, where the former exploits and dominates the latter4. Dependency Theory assumes that modernization is detrimental to gender equality, as it reinforces the patriarchal and capitalist structures and relations that oppress and exploit women, especially in the periphery countries45.

Both theories have some merits and limitations in explaining and addressing the issues of gender equality and subordination of women in modern societies, and need to be revised and complemented by other perspectives that take into account the diversity and complexity of different societies and cultures, and the agency and intersectionality of different women and men265.

To summarize, Modernization Theory and Dependency Theory offer contrasting views on the relationship between modernization and gender equality and the causes and consequences of the subordination of women in modern societies. Modernization Theory tends to view modernization as a positive and inevitable force for gender equality, and the subordination of women as a temporary and transitional phenomenon that will be overcome by the progress of development. Dependency Theory tends to view modernization as a negative and contingent force for gender equality, and the subordination of women as a persistent and structural phenomenon that will be exacerbated by the exploitation of development. Both theories have some strengths and weaknesses and need to be updated and supplemented by other approaches that consider the diversity and agency of women and men in different contexts.

 

(20)

Q. No. 5.

Modernization Theory and Dependency Theory are two of the most common lenses sociologists use when looking at the issues of global inequality and development. They also have different implications for gender equality and the subordination of women in modern societies.

A Modernization Theory is a perspective that argues that economic and technological development leads to social and political progress and that societies follow a linear and universal path of modernization from traditional to modern stages12. Modernization Theory assumes that modernization is conducive to gender equality, as it brings more education, employment, and political rights for women, and reduces the influence of patriarchal and religious norms and values that subordinate women13.

Dependency Theory is a perspective that argues that economic and technological development is uneven and unequal and that the global system is divided into core and periphery countries, where the former exploits and dominates the latter4. Dependency Theory assumes that modernization is detrimental to gender equality, as it reinforces the patriarchal and capitalist structures and relations that oppress and exploit women, especially in the periphery countries45.

Both theories have some merits and limitations in explaining and addressing the issues of gender equality and subordination of women in modern societies, and need to be revised and complemented by other perspectives that take into account the diversity and complexity of different societies and cultures, and the agency and intersectionality of different women and men265.

To summarize, Modernization Theory and Dependency Theory offer contrasting views on the relationship between modernization and gender equality and the causes and consequences of the subordination of women in modern societies. Modernization Theory tends to view modernization as a positive and inevitable force for gender equality, and the subordination of women as a temporary and transitional phenomenon that will be overcome by the progress of development. Dependency Theory tends to view modernization as a negative and contingent force for gender equality, and the subordination of women as a persistent and structural phenomenon that will be exacerbated by the exploitation of development. Both theories have some strengths and weaknesses and need to be updated and supplemented by other approaches that consider the diversity and agency of women and men in different contexts.

 

(20)

Q. No. 6.

Women’s participation in the labor force has increased recently yet women continue to perform their reproductive roles. Discuss the challenges encountered by women as a result of their paid employment worldwide with special reference to Pakistan.

A . Women’s participation in the labor force has increased in recent decades, but it is still lower than men’s in most countries and regions, and is influenced by various factors, such as education, income, culture, religion, family, and social norms. Women face many challenges as a result of their paid employment, both in the formal and informal sectors, such as the gender wage gap, work-family balance, workplace harassment and violence, and lack of social protection and rights. Pakistan is one of the countries with the lowest female labor force participation rates in the world, and its women workers face many of the same challenges as their counterparts in other countries, but also some specific ones, such as religious and cultural barriers, security and safety issues, and lack of infrastructure and services.

Summary:

  • Women’s participation in the labor force has increased, but it is still lower than men’s and is influenced by various factors.
  • Women face many challenges as a result of their paid employment, such as lower wages, more work and care responsibilities, harassment and violence, and less protection and rights.
  • Pakistan’s women workers face additional challenges due to the patriarchal and feudal culture, norms, and values that subordinate and discriminate against women.

 

(20)

Q. No. 7.

Explain the structural and direct forms of violence against women in Pakistani society by highlighting the case study of Mukhtaran Mai.

1 . Structural and Direct Violence Against Women in Pakistan

2 . The Case Study of Mukhtaran Mai

Summary

  • The question of structural and direct violence against women in Pakistan is a complex and multifaceted one that requires a holistic and human rights-based approach to understand and address.
  • Violence against women in Pakistan is influenced by the patriarchal and feudal culture, norms, and values that subordinate and discriminate against women, and the unequal and unfair distribution of power and resources in society, based on gender and other factors.

The case study of Mukhtaran Mai illustrates the challenges and opportunities that women face in seeking justice and dignity in Pakistan and the courage and resilience that women display in transforming their trauma into empowerment

(20)

 

                                                                                                      

Q. No. 8.

Write short notes on any TWO of the following.                                                                            (10 each)

a.      Suffragist movement

b.      Postmodern Feminism

c.      Structural Functionalism

Here are some short notes on the topics you asked:

a. Suffragist movement: The suffragist movement was a social and political movement that aimed to secure the right to vote for women in various countries and regions. The movement began in the late 19th century and continued until the early 20th century, when many countries granted universal suffrage to women. Some of the prominent leaders and organizations of the suffragist movement were Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Emmeline Pankhurst, the Women’s Social and Political Union, and the American Woman Suffrage Association. The suffragist movement was influenced by the ideals of democracy, equality, and human rights, and faced opposition from conservative, religious, and patriarchal forces123

b. Postmodern Feminism: Postmodern feminism is a branch of third-wave feminism that incorporates the philosophies of postmodernism, post-structuralism, and French feminism. It sees gender stereotypes as culturally constructed through language and aims to de-throne the prevalent patriarchal binary norms, in favor of embracing differences and individual experiences. Postmodern feminism rejects the notions of essentialism, universalism, and objectivity, and instead emphasizes the importance of social context, power relations, and multiple discourses in understanding gender. Postmodern feminism has been criticized for being too theoretical, relativistic, and disconnected from real-world issues. Some of the influential thinkers and concepts of postmodern feminism are Michel Foucault, Judith Butler, Donna Haraway, deconstruction, and performativity456

c. Structural Functionalism: Structural functionalism is a macro-level sociological perspective that focuses on large-scale social structures, social institutions, their interrelationships, and their implications on society. It was developed by Emile Durkheim and Talcott Parsons and has various developing theories such as Division of Labor, AGIL model, Concept of Function, and Functional Theory of Stratification. Structural functionalism assumes that society is a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability and that each part has a function that contributes to the overall harmony and equilibrium of the system. Structural functionalism has been criticized for being conservative, deterministic, and simplistic, as it ignores the conflicts, changes, and diversity of society789

 

(20)

 

CSS EXAMINATION-2018:GENDER STUDIES

             FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION                                             COMPETITIVE EXAMINATION-2021                     ...